hadoop-common-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From zGreenfelder <zgreenfel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: recommendation on HDDs
Date Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:48:53 GMT
untopposing everything.

>> > Since the OP believes that their requirement is 1TB per node... a single
>> > 2TB would be the best choice. It allows for additional space and you
>> really
>> > shouldn't be too worried about disk i/o being your bottleneck.
>>

>> The original poster also seemed somewhat interested in disk bandwidth.
>>
>> That is facilitated by having more than on disk in the box.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Michael Segel <michael_segel@hotmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Shrinivas Joshi <jshrinivas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks much to all who shared their inputs. This really helps. It would be
> nice to have a wiki page collecting all this good information. I will check
> with that. We are definitely going with large capacity disks (>= 1TB).
>
> -Shrinivas
>

I think the guidelines would be good to capture, but that seems like
it'd be more of a footnote or subsection to a larger hardware
notes/specs/suggestions page with some guides for picking processors,
memory, et al(maybe also noting what flavors of OSes are known to have
particular upside/downsides).   It was noted no less than 3 times in
the thread this is a very fluid target and completely reasonable
choices today (e.g. X TB sata drives) might be viewed as silly in a
year or 6 months.

that's my personal opinion, anyway.



-- 
Even the Magic 8 ball has an opinion on email clients: Outlook not so good.

Mime
View raw message