Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24139 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2010 03:06:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Aug 2010 03:06:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 57868 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2010 03:06:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57485 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2010 03:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57477 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2010 03:06:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 03:06:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of amansk@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 03:06:40 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so8968936qwd.35 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:06:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:references:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=oDXao+Htp0rLRcLXbtgULiB8GUex/SZsbsgMlfXNXHY=; b=JlX5P3zX/RbEDzhbXQuCiLuw2EYulTiZYk5LXaKS+utkN0rCBXQr5706jTZYh6POyO 53fltewQbNezZuBBMVM1LLq6H1QQvyHDhphc76DzavEbk+gj2qLEhoY+uwJ0dkThS3wY 8jd7NtBHU/nE9g9ejle6n05MTwXMOkNnpk8Nc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=VFmLCig7e+JNZoqdORiNWvsiDiwxyYQVd6gw+zAsnkusfcgOKCbeG3X+oTrC7VQjvs DWfVTWZFo0ZZ5ToSkqSHJq0jRmz31Xy+iVUJ2VKulKg9Xn+EYMlrzJvdc2Lu5IC3mm1I GYXK03cEYF1p5XJ8Ldxc6Gf5c7NC+9dZHDZ80= Received: by 10.220.61.199 with SMTP id u7mr9099244vch.140.1281236778924; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:06:18 -0700 (PDT) References: <29378017.post@talk.nabble.com> From: Amandeep Khurana In-Reply-To: <29378017.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A306) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:05:48 -0700 Message-ID: <-417746899929957972@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Ceph as an alternative to HDFS To: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It's certainly not a toy system. It was originally a research project that is now under active development and on it's path to becoming a production quality file system. -Amandeep Sent from my iPhone On Aug 7, 2010, at 7:04 PM, thinke365 wrote: > one year ago, some guy said that ceph is just a toy, and not suitble for > product enviroment, so one year later, is it used in real system?