Return-Path: 
 <common-user-return-22199-apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94348 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 11:49:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 11:49:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 2679 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 11:49:22 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 2530 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 11:49:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:common-user-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:common-user@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Id: <common-user.hadoop.apache.org>
Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 2504 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 11:49:20 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:49:20 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jzillmann@googlemail.com
 designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:49:13 +0000
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so223644eyf.23
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version
         :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding
         :message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        bh=+uHnioUtqZhCKjgfbt4mz4Pn5nYleOk9Zt+l8vDIgLg=;
        b=fjtMWsQ0RUxNV4Zp1uaiDc5ye5MsnKnHE5nySI/gHE4gjYwDGfkXG0w1Nn1EKjt1Vl
         mzxZy/sYXBBzgtXxG8NdaG+YbI91JNY/QZQyYps75wOacZ3Siq0bFw4wGptfv8hz/KfS
         lrSjsDIZPtwpw8d8gcr+uSioC11cHiGozP46c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=E5jV395F7hrLyryYSmiaN+V92Hj/SDug3ONZb6bAVbXpuJ49/GrScJfANEnqzdWFT9
         pHUp3OmI4HZNzr4x14Tdl4Yx9NxYPyvPZdJWgfBSnfTC3Dd5wROHkASbpgPiaWJjf79T
         hConDg959Gjxi6BNRkgWOYgNgdaFcJ7jNyurM=
Received: by 10.213.29.3 with SMTP id o3mr3256755ebc.59.1275392933253;
        Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 83-221-81-89.dynamic.primacom.net
 (83-221-81-89.dynamic.primacom.net [83.221.81.89])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm3769452ewy.2.2010.06.01.04.48.52
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: DNS.reverseDns() fallback
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Johannes Zillmann <jzillmann@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <COL117-W54238C44A1B8B2325E48AF8FEB0@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:48:50 +0200
Cc: <core-user@hadoop.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E3DC199-47C8-40BA-8DD0-A8A1598FE9DB@googlemail.com>
References: 
 <54D4320E-7CA6-439E-93F0-9E99E7A91A26@googlemail.com>,<COL117-W1924B5285B751FB950A8A08FEB0@phx.gbl>,<AANLkTikm7kzqX-MMHk14YfT-7146_dH0lwAKoWsKQaKI@mail.gmail.com>
 <COL117-W54238C44A1B8B2325E48AF8FEB0@phx.gbl>
To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Thanks for your input!
I added an issue for improving the fallback mechanism: =
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6797

Johannes

On May 28, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Michael Segel wrote:

>=20
>=20
>=20
>> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:13:56 -0400
>> Subject: Re: DNS.reverseDns() fallback
>> From: esammer@cloudera.com
>> To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org
>> CC: core-user@hadoop.apache.org
> [SNIP]
>>> IMHO, after looking at this issue, it really doesn't matter since =
the cloud shouldn't be getting a lot of external traffic except on the =
name node/job tracker nodes which could be multi-homed.
>>=20
>> It might be useful in the case where you're streaming data off of =
HDFS
>> directly to clients rather than in the MR or HBase case. Data import =
/
>> export comes to mind. Remember that clients establish a direct
>> connection to data nodes so a multihomed NN is insufficient. In that
>> case, "external" doesn't necessarily mean a public (routable) IP, but
>> simply another network. We've seen use cases for this in some
>> installations. One example is a data aggregation or ingestion network
>> is separate from the Hadoop internal network and you'd like to get
>> data into HDFS.
>>=20
>=20
> Eric,
> I don't disagree that it is useful.=20
>=20
> I was just offering up an alternative cloud design which would work as =
a work-around.
> As you point out, clients need to talk to all of the nodes.
> So you can make your name node your gateway for the rest of the cloud.
> (not a great idea but it works.)
> Or you can launch your jobs from a client or clients, who are =
multi-homed.
>=20
> If you're a Cloudera fan, you could use the cloudera desktop to launch =
jobs.
> So as long as that machine is visible to the cloud, you'll be OK too. =
;-)
>=20
> I don't really recommend this, but its still a viable solution.
>=20
> -Mike
>=20
>=20
> 		 	   		 =20
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from =
your inbox.
> =
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:=
ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2