Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9941 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 18:43:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 18:43:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 3649 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 18:43:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3500 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 18:43:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3492 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 18:43:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 18:43:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of runping.qi@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 18:43:03 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so3823949ywh.2 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 11:42:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mbDPgFTvgFFF3dgDg0NIfY1PfAhtj3xYn/wo6/uQzls=; b=GmK9ujZMrwUBc2RNRh/zye5EaXjWKYjqMvZx4eklXHSksM7I1iZpkXpkQ/Z0Dz6/+9 LnfuDezTTWsEwOA6a5Hmm1Ik7bSqYo6Mo+k67uTrTouawdK4udHu/cD5prgaHxTopK1q gM11+aOdOJh+G2On9EFY8yCp7t6FqDEr1kopc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Dt1pWvy7qC2yxNU8CPwmyPX0c6PX5qxojyDQid5zWQu49XqF7HWxtX09YfddJyVCp8 vv81U9NGk8fmaWsohspXCZtkJJlRE7k3asmsVh92okulQ+XeVvgv1xEZ75fbz2O2GUAS nVq8qgf8nAtRO77+So2dwUi/oaUom3CH7De08= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.205.6 with SMTP id h6mr2747782anq.179.1273603361289; Tue, 11 May 2010 11:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.44.8 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 11:42:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <592DB90D-7F81-4188-8F76-384D99C7EB2C@linkedin.com> References: <592DB90D-7F81-4188-8F76-384D99C7EB2C@linkedin.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 11:42:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Namenode warnings From: Runping Qi To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68ee227efcd90048655e370 --0016e68ee227efcd90048655e370 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So it's a known problem of Hadoop 0.19? On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 11, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Runping Qi wrote: > > > I am using Hadoop 0.19. > > > > Anybody knows what might be the problem? > > I think you answered your own question. :) > > --0016e68ee227efcd90048655e370--