Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3405 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 17:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 17:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 70863 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 17:43:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70806 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 17:43:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70796 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 17:43:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:43:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of greycat.na.kor@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:43:13 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so1426868bwz.29 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:42:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8U3ugpphf5GW1OWP2VlAiqa9mDSAQrnRON/YdIZp29s=; b=ROiiS6Y9HzlnVaaPiB1CQjErLPgdYBTyEGZ64NupfIMY/5Hx9tOn+qw60S3MynJK9g RV/NPVGOlnWp8/W1fCDhR7VtNDCz0DT2xRJfPiV8a/K5CJSDkDc6y6rPzCeJfe2qvPZf yjLZJclXZsX1LGFs2CGs7ZK5yTIXBm/cSCuME= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uZgZPChdf6iHVryPjwy+ttIgM3IroqAlYXQJhSR7tJDKK2k2n0EQJi7B6CxRo4MP4c ZX7e44o4JueWeX0dRJFhTmdanMMYD+LmM3hM7rQvVaSJ1Jcjhhw6LKHvGmEegfPNKwiN GbUrTW3ELw8A064CcFKNL48mhyQcQJbYRhSPI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.160.86 with SMTP id m22mr4935072bkx.82.1257529373067; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:42:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4AF410C5.7020304@apache.org> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:42:52 +0300 Message-ID: <240e377b0911060942y6701796cg5ab70cf384878241@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Cluster Machines From: Mikhail Yakshin To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> On 11/6/09 4:04 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > If you want to do a virtualized setup I suggest > http://www.linux-vserver.org/Welcome_to_Linux-VServer.org > Why? > Its is very close to a Solaris Zone in that unlike wm/vmware =C2=A0linux > vserver is a "jail" =C2=A0system with resource controls for CPU (timeslic= e) > / memory etc. There is no emulation going on here, just a few more ops > in the patched kernel so its fast. > > I use it extensively with hadoop and everything I do. In your case > since you want to duel purpose machines it can be very effective in > that you can run instances on the same machine and set resource > controls to make sure they do not trample each other. I suggest to not waste time with VServer and proceed right to OpenVZ. It's basically the same thing, i.e. effective para-virtualization, but with a lot of extra features, such as resource usage limits, advanced scheduler, advanced network stack, etc. --=20 WBR, Mikhail Yakshin