hadoop-common-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Loddengaard <a...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Wich is better Namenode and JobTracker run in different server or not?
Date Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:37:54 GMT
It's unnecessary to run the NN and JT daemons on separate machines in small
clusters with more than three nodes.  You'll only have performance benefits
by putting these daemons on separate machines if you have a large (100s of
nodes) cluster.  It makes sense to separate the NN and JT daemons in a three
node cluster as well, assuming each node is a DataNode and TaskTracker as

Hope this clears things up.


On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:37 AM, calikus <onur_calikus@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I wonder which is better, Namenode and JobTracker run in different server
> or
> not?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Wich-is-better-Namenode-and-JobTracker-run-in-different-server-or-not--tp24321039p24321039.html
> Sent from the Hadoop core-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message