Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19410 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2009 06:13:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2009 06:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 21589 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2009 06:13:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21491 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2009 06:13:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21481 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2009 06:13:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:13:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:13:15 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n3T6CQEj001329 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:12:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=GTpAXRyrdr5mo+VrCaUm50aeIHxZ3zvsB6KczF3yjot69Fw4TpOeiOaGHJet+PTG Received: from SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.185]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:12:25 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9C891.76F05DFF" Subject: Re: Appropriate for Hadoop? Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:12:24 -0700 Message-ID: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B46590131C905@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Appropriate for Hadoop? Thread-Index: AcnIkXbd3r8TGZ6iTUKQ+NsvM0AYQg== From: "Sharad Agarwal" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2009 06:12:25.0985 (UTC) FILETIME=[77A47710:01C9C891] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C891.76F05DFF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adam Retter wrote: > > So I don't have to use HDFS at all when using Hadoop? The input URI list has to be stored in HDFS. Each mapper will work on a sublist of URIs depending on the no of maps set in job. - Sharad ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9C891.76F05DFF--