Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30278 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2008 16:28:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2008 16:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 75562 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2008 16:28:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75199 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2008 16:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75190 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2008 16:28:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.174] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:27:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (p54B39D42.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.157.66]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu8) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML31I-1JmAUd2nux-0003K7; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4806291B.5010204@andremartin.de> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:28:11 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Martin?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: How often Name node fails? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/YAX2OK5wCW19f0Rs3q+exwruYjE9v7gvnuk0 467wdfoutzZNf5ykjCLHEs6djUBWMIGvPxLV7M4kzkhbOIlciA y2QedsdRAS0ZQNnPyipmz95WIPOjmlw X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Cagdas & Michael, our cluster works fine with no crashes so far even with more than one million files - we have 11 datanodes and one namenode... Cu on the 'net, Bye - bye, <<<<< Andr� <<<< >>>> �rbnA >>>>> Michael Bieniosek wrote: > From my experience, the namenode almost never crashes. It does use a lot of RAM, but not nearly as much as it used to. You might have problems if you have many many small files (maybe 100,000s?). > > I have had more problems with datanode failures, particularly when there is mapreduce-generated load on the machines running the datanodes. > > -Michael > > On 4/14/08 3:14 PM, "Cagdas Gerede" wrote: > > From your experience with Hadoop Distributed File System, > how reliable is the namenode? How often does it fail? Are there mechanisms > developed outside of Hadoop to make namenode more fault tolerant? > > Thanks for your feedback,