Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97771 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2008 15:05:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2008 15:05:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 17565 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2008 15:05:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17498 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2008 15:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17015 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2008 15:05:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:05:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:04:55 +0000 Received: from [207.47.35.84] (snvvpn2-10-72-76-c40.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.40]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m0TF4ER2060265 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:04:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=H0e8oNMdbnMJzEZI2o5/LQgDTUSGdX/LsEPfaTqE2TXZLY/hSfan3raGzyJ9QfLs Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <15153682.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <898448.62794.qm@web57211.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <635575.71490.qm@web53610.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <15153682.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Arun C Murthy Subject: Re: Task was killed due to running over 600 sec Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:03:30 -0800 To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:12 PM, ChaoChun Liang wrote: > > > lohit.vijayarenu wrote: >> >> You could try setting the value of mapred.task.timeout to higher >> value. >> Thanks, >> Lohit >> > > Could I set the different timeout values for the maper and reducer > separately? > In my case, the execution time for the mapper is short than the > reducer. > No. There isn't a way to do that. However, it really _is_ better to send progress/status-updates to the TaskTracker rather than to work around it... infact it is as simple as calling *reporter.progress()* periodically, or reporter.setStatus on the reporter which is passed to the map/reduce method. It helps debugging too... Arun > Thanks. > ChaoChun > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Task-was-killed- > due-to-running-over-600-sec-tp15148129p15153682.html > Sent from the Hadoop core-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >