Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 23439 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2007 21:51:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2007 21:51:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 72001 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2007 19:01:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 71972 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2007 19:01:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 71963 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2007 19:01:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:01:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael@powerset.com designates 207.5.72.93 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.5.72.93] (HELO exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net) (207.5.72.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:01:28 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net ([207.5.72.71]) by exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net ([207.5.72.93]) with mapi; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:00:59 -0700 From: Michael Bieniosek To: "hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org" , Doug Cutting Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:00:56 -0700 Subject: Re: jdk6 on darwin Thread-Topic: jdk6 on darwin Thread-Index: AcgM/qj1oCSyDGPDR4GgSRLboB1NnQAA48Bm Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <470FBE38.9090506@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C335127817A23michaelpowersetcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C335127817A23michaelpowersetcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ah, okay. I thought Owen was suggesting that we move to requiring java 1.6= for compilation or runtime, but it appears it is still a little early for = that in terms of availability of java 1.6. -Michael On 10/12/07 11:34 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: Colin Evans wrote: > I'm a bit confused by this discussion though. How would compiling the > jars with Java 1.5 and running on 1.6 degrade performance (assuming that > the jars don't use any new 1.6 APIs)? It won't. The claim is just that running with Java 1.5 degrades performance significantly. The source code is compatible with Java 1.5, and code compiled with Java 1.5 runs efficiently in Java 1.6. So recompilation will make 0.14.2 work in Java 1.5 and Java 1.6. This has been the way we normally produce Hadoop releases: compile with Java 1.5 and recommend Java 1.6 as the runtime. I made a mistake when building 0.14.2, and used Java 1.6 to compile it, and no one noticed until after the release was published. The question is whether this warrants a 0.14.3 release, compiled with Java 1.5. I'm currently leaning that way. Doug --_000_C335127817A23michaelpowersetcom_--