hadoop-common-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Briggs <acidbri...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: two servers nutch hadoop
Date Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:22:22 GMT
Well, hopefully someone else will chime in.  I look forward to finding out!

On 4/30/07, derevo <dai@inbox.ru> wrote:
>
> The slave1 server see open ports
>
> slave1# nmap -v -sS -p 9000-9100 216.32.77.34
>
> Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-04-30 10:00 CDT
> Scanning reverse89.reserver.ru (216.32.77.34) [101 ports]
> Discovered open port 9000/tcp on 216.32.77.34
> Discovered open port 9001/tcp on 216.32.77.34
> PORT     STATE SERVICE
> 9000/tcp open  unknown
> 9001/tcp open  unknown
> Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.049 seconds
>                Raw packets sent: 168 (7372B) | Rcvd: 169 (7786B)
>
>
> on both server in conf/hadoop-site.xml  i have
>
>                 <name>fs.default.name</name>
>                 <value>216.32.77.34:9000</value>
>
>                 <name>mapred.job.tracker</name>
>                 <value>216.32.77.34:9001</value>
>
>
>
>
>
> >So, the port is not open to the slave servers. Only the master can
> >connect to both 9000 and 9001.  Hey, I just ran into that problem on
> >Friday.  Not sure how this thing is getting set that way.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/two-servers--nutch--hadoop-tf3670129.html#a10256169
> Sent from the Hadoop Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
"Conscious decisions by conscious minds are what make reality real"

Mime
View raw message