Mailing-List: contact hadoop-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
	h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:
	content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index:in-reply-to;
	b=ifdIvQcKh1xCSGqYN1YbOh3o2u5StYNo4r00qsJ+Z6n2OlrUew11cUPQeHfu8HP4
From: "Dhruba Borthakur" <dhruba@yahoo-inc.com>
To: <hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Name node failover
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:41:36 -0800
Message-ID: <00b001c734d6$3227bfe0$639115ac@ds.corp.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: Acc0urpyb0bw8MZGSUKqk8GVmvnbDgAG2BmA
In-Reply-To: <3d717a3d0701100455q4531b0c7w434d22be1721b19b@mail.gmail.com>

Periodic checkpointing is expected to be ready by the end of this month.

Thanks,
dhruba

-----Original Message-----
From: Sarvesh Singh [mailto:serveshp@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:56 AM
To: hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Name node failover

Thanks! when is it expected?

On 1/10/07, Gautam Kowshik <gautamk@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
> There are plans to implement periodic check pointing of namenode data so
> as to be revived quickly after a failure. As of now a namenode revival
> is manual and begins from the start.
> You can follow this [1] bug for developments on check pointing.
>
> -Gautam.
> [1] - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-227
>
> Sarvesh Singh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like name node failover is not yet implemented after seeing
> some
> > emails over this alias.
> > I tested name node failover scenario and it does not work
> > When is it expected to get implemented?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Servesh
> >
>
>