Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 86046 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2006 18:27:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2006 18:27:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 64350 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2006 18:27:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64323 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2006 18:27:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64297 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2006 18:27:11 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:27:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [204.127.192.85] (HELO rwcrmhc15.comcast.net) (204.127.192.85) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:26:35 -0800 Received: from [192.168.168.15] (c-71-202-24-246.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[71.202.24.246]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20061221182559m1500sppvke>; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:25:59 +0000 Message-ID: <458AD1B6.4090806@apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:25:58 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Urgent: Production Issues References: <458a3de9.581b710c.2e20.ffff8355@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <458a3de9.581b710c.2e20.ffff8355@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jagadeesh wrote: > Over the past day we have managed to migrate our clusters from 0.7.2 to > 0.9.0. Thanks for sharing your experiences. Please note that there is now a 0.9.2 release. There should be no compatibility issues upgrading from 0.9.0 to 0.9.2, and a number of bugs are fixed, so I would recommend that upgrade. Cheers, Doug