hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Lowe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-14926) Reconsider the default value of RPC timeout and document it
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2017 22:16:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16190456#comment-16190456
] 

Jason Lowe commented on HADOOP-14926:
-------------------------------------

I do not see how zero would be a valid timeout.  The RPC call would immediately timeout before
it has even reached the remote server, preventing any RPC call from succeeding.

Many systems implement zero timeout as an indefinite wait when zero makes no sense.  Besides
Java's socket libs, the {{wait}} builtin does this as well, since it doesn't make sense to
wait if there's no time that will elapse -- simply don't call {{wait}} if you do not want
to wait.  Similarly, it makes no sense to try to complete an RPC call in zero time.

I don't see how we can change the interpretation of zero without breaking compatibility, and
I also don't see how a literally zero-wait timeout is useful to configure in practice since
every RPC call will fail.  If we want to add -1 as yet another way to specify an infinite
wait that's fine with me, but changing the interpretation of zero will be problematic for
dubious benefit.


> Reconsider the default value of RPC timeout and document it
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14926
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14926
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: common
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.1, 3.0.0-alpha3
>            Reporter: Yufei Gu
>
> We use zero as the default value of RPC timeout, which mean we don't enforce any timeout
aka infinity timeout. I think that *zero means infinite* is counter-intuitive and error-prone
through some Java libs(e.g. Socket #setSoTimeout()) do that as well. Zero could be considered
as a valid timeout value, while negative one isn't. If we use zero to represent infinite,
which number could be used to represent zero timeout? I suggest use -1 as the default value
to indicate infinite. 
> We also need to document the default value and it means infinite timeout. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message