hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xiaoyu Yao (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-14920) KMSClientProvider won't work with KMS delegation token retrieved from non-Java client.
Date Fri, 06 Oct 2017 06:48:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Xiaoyu Yao updated HADOOP-14920:
--------------------------------
    Attachment:     (was: HADOOP-14920.003.patch)

> KMSClientProvider won't work with KMS delegation token retrieved from non-Java client.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14920
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14920
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Xiaoyu Yao
>            Assignee: Xiaoyu Yao
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14920.001.patch, HADOOP-14920.002.patch, HADOOP-14920.003.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-13381 added support to use KMS delegation token to connect to KMS server for key
operations. However, the logic to check if the UGI container KMS delegation token assumes
that the token must contain a service attribute. Otherwise, a KMS delegation token won't be
recognized.
> For delegation token obtained via non-java client such curl (http), the default DelegationTokenAuthenticationHandler
only support *renewer* parameter and assume the client itself will add the service attribute.
This makes a java client with KMSClientProvdier can't use for KMS delegation token retrieved
form non-java client because the token does not contain a service attribute. 
> I did some investigation on this and found two solutions:
> 1. Similar use case exists for webhdfs, and webhdfs supports it with a ["service" parameter|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.8.0/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-hdfs/WebHDFS.html#Get_Delegation_Token].
> We can do this similarly by allowing client to specify a service attribute in the request
URL and included in the token returned like webhdfs. Even though this will change in DelegationTokenAuthenticationHandler
and may affect many other web component,  this seems to be a clean and low risk solution because
it will be an optional parameter. Also, other components get non-java client interop support
for free if they have the similar use case. 
> 2. The other way to solve this is to release the token check in KMSClientProvider to
check only the token kind instead of the service.  This is an easy work around but seems less
optimal to me. 
> cc: [~xiaochen] for additional input.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message