Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F469200C65 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 18:22:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 4DDB1160BA0; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 946DD160BA9 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 18:22:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 89626 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2017 16:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89611 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2017 16:22:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2A98BC036F for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.201 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-2qPiT69Hab for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 39AED5FC8D for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 73222E0D53 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B3A0521DE9 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-14365) Stabilise FileSystem builder-based create API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:22:11 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15989929#comment-15989929 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-14365: ----------------------------------------- I'm marking this as a blocker to make clear I don't consider the feature ready for use yet. Core functionality behind the scenes may be good, a replacement for the massively overridden {{create()}} needed, but without the specification and the set of cross-FS tests designed to break it rather that just demo it, it's not something people can trust. I think it wasn't ready for branch-2 yet, but as its there, it's there. I'm just adding this as a blocker to say "people mustn't use the API yet", and to force the fixing of the problem, rather than just people hoping to ignore this JIRA. Feel free to download for a to critical release after first updating the release notes for HDFS-11170 to say "not ready for use, method name may change, etc". > Stabilise FileSystem builder-based create API > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-14365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 2.9.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Priority: Blocker > > HDFS-11170 added a builder-based create API for file creation which has a few issues to work out before it can be considered ready for use > 1. There no specification in the filesystem.md of what it is meant to do, which means there's no public documentation on expected behaviour except on the Javadocs, which consists of the sentences "Create a new FSDataOutputStreamBuilder for the file with path" and "Base of specific file system FSDataOutputStreamBuilder". > I propose: > # Give the new method a relevant name rather than just define the return type, e.g. {{createFile()}}. > # `Filesystem.md` to be extended with coverage of this method, and, sadly for the authors, coverage of what the semantics of {{FSDataOutputStreamBuilder.build()}} are. > 2. There are only tests for HDFS and local, neither of them perfect. Proposed: move to {{AbstractContractCreateTest}}, test for all filesystems, fix tests and FS where appropriate. > 3. Add more tests to generate the failure conditions implied by the updated filesystem spec. Eg. create over a an existing file, create over a directory, create with negative buffer size, negative block size, empty dest path, etc, etc. > This will clarify when precondition checks are made, as well as whether. For example: should {{newFSDataOutputStreamBuilder()}} validate the path immediately? > 4. Add to {{FileContext}}. > 5. Take the opportunity to look at the flaws in today's {{create()}} calls and address them, rather than replicate. In particular, I'd like to end the behaviour "create all parent dirs. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org