Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F996200C5C for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8E342160B94; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D8690160BA3 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:38:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 8838 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2017 05:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8677 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2017 05:38:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 05:38:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5B85B1806FB for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:38:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfzkT5Kyr-04 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B94255FDB4 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3ED9AE0D31 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 48C602409A for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:38:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsuyoshi Ozawa (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-13363) Upgrade protobuf from 2.5.0 to something newer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 05:38:47 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15958318#comment-15958318 ] Tsuyoshi Ozawa commented on HADOOP-13363: ----------------------------------------- [~andrew.wang] I thought this should be in alpha3, personally. After discussion on ML, we confirmed that proto2 syntax is compatible with protobuf spec v2. We have enough confidence to update protobuf version, I think. {quote} Would it make sense having a shaded-3rdparty-libs jar that had relocated protobuf and other libs we want to shade? {quote} It makes sense to me, but IIUC, this is one kind of optimization to reduce jar size. IMHO, we can make this change later. What do you think? > Upgrade protobuf from 2.5.0 to something newer > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-13363 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-13363.001.patch, HADOOP-13363.002.patch, HADOOP-13363.003.patch, HADOOP-13363.004.patch, HADOOP-13363.005.patch > > > Standard protobuf 2.5.0 does not work properly on many platforms. (See, for example, https://gist.github.com/BennettSmith/7111094 ). In order for us to avoid crazy work arounds in the build environment and the fact that 2.5.0 is starting to slowly disappear as a standard install-able package for even Linux/x86, we need to either upgrade or self bundle or something else. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org