hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Mackrory (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-14215) DynamoDB client should waitForActive on existing tables
Date Thu, 06 Apr 2017 23:52:41 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Sean Mackrory updated HADOOP-14215:
    Attachment: HADOOP-14215-HADOOP-13345.002.patch

Attaching a patch with the test added. The test borrows heavily from how ITestS3AConcurrentOps
ended up doing things.

The characteristics of the test seem to vary wildly, but I think I'm almost satisfied. I'm
going to do a bunch more test runs just to be more certain. Last night I was able to reproduce
the problem in 1 or 2 threads in each iteration within 1 or 2 iterations. This morning I had
a bunch of test runs that couldn't reproduce the problem. This afternoon I saw all but 1 thread
(sometimes all threads - which was weird - see below) in every single iteration experience
the error.

Immediately after getting a bunch of test runs that had the problem very severely, I applied
your patch, and the results started being complete success 75% of the time, and once in a
while a single thread had a failure. I then realized I was missing your retry-until-version-marker-is-present
fix. I added that and I haven't had a failure since. I mention all that detail because I'm
afraid I didn't think to really dig into the logs on the occasional cases when not a single
thread failed, so I'm only guessing that those were the cases that didn't hit the UPDATING
state, but that did lose the race condition with the version marker.

So again, I'm going to do a bunch more test runs to be sure, but I think things are looking
good. +1 to your changes based on a visual code review, too.

> DynamoDB client should waitForActive on existing tables
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-14215
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14215
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/s3
>            Reporter: Sean Mackrory
>            Assignee: Sean Mackrory
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14215-HADOOP-13345.000.patch, HADOOP-14215-HADOOP-13345.001.patch,
> I saw a case where 2 separate applications tried to use the same non-pre-existing table
with table.create = true at about the same time. One failed with a ResourceInUse exception.
If a table does not exist, we attempt to create it and then wait for it to enter the active
state. If another jumps in in the middle of that, the table may exist, thus bypassing our
call to waitForActive(), and then try to use the table immediately.
> While we're at it, let's also make sure that the race condition where a table might get
created between checking if it exists and attempting to create it is handled gracefully.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org

View raw message