hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lei (Eddy) Xu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-13449) S3Guard: Implement DynamoDBMetadataStore.
Date Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:06:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15602745#comment-15602745

Lei (Eddy) Xu commented on HADOOP-13449:

bq. . I'm wondering whether we should also save access time, owner, group, permission, size
etc in the metadata,

Yes, in theory, we can save them. However, for S3AFileStatus, these fields are not set, while
the tests are not test the special cases of S3AFIleStatus (i.e., whether {{isEmptyDirectory()
== true && DirMetadata.isEmpty()}} ).   IMO, we should modify the tests for these

I am working on reviewing the rest of the patch. Will post a review soon. Thanks for the good

> S3Guard: Implement DynamoDBMetadataStore.
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-13449
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13449
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/s3
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Assignee: Mingliang Liu
>         Attachments: HADOOP-13449-HADOOP-13345.000.patch
> Provide an implementation of the metadata store backed by DynamoDB.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org

View raw message