hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kai Zheng (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-11588) Benchmark framework and test for erasure coders
Date Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:39:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15416474#comment-15416474

Kai Zheng commented on HADOOP-11588:

Thanks [~lirui] for the work! The patch LGTM. Only some minors:
1. Do you have some rational not to place the micro benchmark tool in the test scope?
2. In the benchmark tool codes, could we refactor some bit to avoid typos like 'client'? It's
a cmd tool without connecting any server.
3. In the benchmark test codes: note {{public void testISALCOder()}} a typo; could we use
enum names to mention the coder index?

> Benchmark framework and test for erasure coders
> -----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-11588
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11588
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: io
>            Reporter: Kai Zheng
>            Assignee: Rui Li
>         Attachments: HADOOP-11588-HDFS-7285.2.patch, HADOOP-11588-v1.patch, HADOOP-11588.3.patch,
HADOOP-11588.4.patch, HADOOP-11588.5.patch, HADOOP-11588.6.patch, HADOOP-11588.7.patch
> Given more than one erasure coders are implemented for a code scheme, we need benchmark
and test to help evaluate which one outperforms in certain environment. This is to implement
the benchmark framework.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org

View raw message