Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAB9A1964C for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18654 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2016 00:42:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18603 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2016 00:42:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18441 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2016 00:42:25 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:42:25 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC502C1F6B for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:42:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12956) Inevitable Log4j2 migration via slf4j MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12956?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D15= 213694#comment-15213694 ]=20 Andrew Purtell commented on HADOOP-12956: ----------------------------------------- We also evaluated a move to log4j2 for HBase on HBASE-10092, and likewise c= ame to the conclusion it is impossible to achieve backwards compatibility f= or operators and tools. A change like this can't go in on a minor release. = (At least, HBase cannot do that, according to our published version compati= bility guidelines.) The killer issue is no backwards compatibility for the = properties based configuration files. Operators, not unreasonably, expect a= minor or patch version increment should continue to "just work" with exist= ing configuration files and tooling, not completely break all logging.=20 I see after LOG4J2-952 there is a "PropertiesConfigurationFactory", so _a_ = properties based configuration file format is again possible, but this isn'= t helpful and probably not desired because you get the limitations of a pro= perties file format without v1 compatibility. > Inevitable Log4j2 migration via slf4j > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-12956 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12956 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Gopal V > > {{5 August 2015 --The Apache Logging Services=E2=84=A2 Project Management= Committee (PMC) has announced that the Log4j=E2=84=A2 1.x logging framewor= k has reached its end of life (EOL) and is no longer officially supported.}= } > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache_logging_services_project= _announces > A whole framework log4j2 upgrade has to be synchronized, partly for impro= ved performance brought about by log4j2. > https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Performance -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)