Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AD5A109B5 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35955 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2015 00:09:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35896 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2015 00:09:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35625 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2015 00:09:38 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:09:38 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:09:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-11697) Use larger value for fs.s3a.connection.timeout. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14353936#comment-14353936 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-11697: ------------------------------------ {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12703530/HADOOP-11697.001.patch against trunk revision d6e05c5. {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5897//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5897//console This message is automatically generated. > Use larger value for fs.s3a.connection.timeout. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-11697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11697 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 2.6.0 > Reporter: Lei (Eddy) Xu > Assignee: Lei (Eddy) Xu > Priority: Minor > Labels: s3 > Attachments: HADOOP-11697.001.patch, HDFS-7908.000.patch > > > The default value of {{fs.s3a.connection.timeout}} is {{50000}} milliseconds. It causes many {{SocketTimeoutException}} when uploading large files using {{hadoop fs -put}}. > Also, the units for {{fs.s3a.connection.timeout}} and {{fs.s3a.connection.estaablish.timeout}} are milliseconds. For s3 connections, I think it is not necessary to have sub-seconds timeout value. Thus I suggest to change the time unit to seconds, to easy sys admin's job. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)