Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 959A911ECF for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77796 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2014 08:32:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77743 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2014 08:32:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77730 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2014 08:32:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:32:05 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:32:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-10131) NetWorkTopology#countNumOfAvailableNodes() is returning wrong value if excluded nodes passed are not part of the cluster tree MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14063280#comment-14063280 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-10131: ------------------------------------ {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616044/HADOOP-10131.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestIPC org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestSymlinkLocalFSFileSystem org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestSymlinkLocalFSFileContext org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.TestMetricsSystemImpl {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4290//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4290//console This message is automatically generated. > NetWorkTopology#countNumOfAvailableNodes() is returning wrong value if excluded nodes passed are not part of the cluster tree > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-10131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.0.5-alpha > Reporter: Vinayakumar B > Assignee: Vinayakumar B > Attachments: HADOOP-10131.patch, HDFS-5112.patch > > > I got "File /hdfs_COPYING_ could only be replicated to 0 nodes instead of minReplication (=1). There are 1 datanode(s) running and 1 node(s) are excluded in this operation." in the following case > 1. 2 DNs cluster, > 2. One of the datanodes was not responding from last 10 min, but about to detect as dead at NN. > 3. Tried to write one file, for the block NN allocated both DNs. > 4. Client While creating the pipeline took some time to detect one node failure. > 5. Before client detects pipeline failure, NN side dead node was removed from cluster map. > 6. Now, client has abandoned previous block and asked for new block with dead node in excluded list and got above exception even though one more node was available live. > When I dig this more, found that, > {{NetWorkTopology#countNumOfAvailableNodes()}} is not giving correct count when the excludeNodes passed from client are not part of the cluster map. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)