hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (HADOOP-10383) InterfaceStability annotations should have RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:10:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13920436#comment-13920436
] 

Chris Douglas edited comment on HADOOP-10383 at 3/5/14 6:10 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Is it impractical to use the javax.tools compiler API, instead of changing the retention?
Runtime behavior shouldn't depend on these documentation annotations. [edit - wrong package]


was (Author: chris.douglas):
Is it impractical to use the java.tool compiler API, instead of changing the retention? Runtime
behavior shouldn't depend on these documentation annotations.

> InterfaceStability annotations should have RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10383
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.4.0
>
>         Attachments: hadoop-10383_v1.patch
>
>
> Same as in HADOOP-10374. Forgot to make the change there. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message