hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Enis Soztutar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-10383) InterfaceStability annotations should have RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2014 03:26:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13931350#comment-13931350
] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HADOOP-10383:
----------------------------------------

bq. It's a static check intended for auditing API compatibility, so adding the extra information
at runtime is avoidable. I don't know of any practical issues with runtime retention, but
it's not necessary, either.
In HBase but we are actually making use of it in runtime in unit tests so that we make sure
that we won't break BC (See HBASE-8546, HBASE-10462, and HBASE-8275). I think in Hadoop we
can do a similar test. 

I'll commit this unless further comments. 

> InterfaceStability annotations should have RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10383
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.4.0
>
>         Attachments: hadoop-10383_v1.patch
>
>
> Same as in HADOOP-10374. Forgot to make the change there. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message