hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9517) Document Hadoop Compatibility
Date Fri, 31 May 2013 21:50:22 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13671838#comment-13671838
] 

Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-9517:
--------------------------------------------

[~sanjay.radia], on the proto files being public or not. Don't you think the proto files for
client interfaces should be public? I was chatting with Todd about this, and it seems to us
they should.

On a different note, we should document we can change name of fields in proto files if we
keep the ID/type/required|optional.
                
> Document Hadoop Compatibility
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9517
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9517
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Arun C Murthy
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517.patch,
hadoop-9517-proposal-v1.patch, hadoop-9517-proposal-v1.patch
>
>
> As we get ready to call hadoop-2 stable we need to better define 'Hadoop Compatibility'.
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Compatibility is a start, let's document requirements clearly
and completely.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message