Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07F1AF6C6 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18587 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2013 20:08:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18519 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2013 20:08:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18333 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2013 20:08:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:08:16 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:08:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9520) _HOST doesn't resolve to bound interface MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13645913#comment-13645913 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-9520: ------------------------------------------ FWIW, I'm fully expecting to fix this bug myself like I did for our branch-1 install. People wanted me to file bugs. I did and got the fully expected push back that ops teams are required to hard code everything (despite this being completely unnecessary and mostly unintuitive vs ~4 code change). > _HOST doesn't resolve to bound interface > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-9520 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9520 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > _HOST appears to ignore bound interfaces. For example, if a host has two interfaces such that: > nic0 = gethostname() > nic1 = someothername > and then I configure the namenode or resource manager to use someothername:####, the system still treats _HOST = nic0. This is especially harmful for Kerberos principals. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira