Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E09161017C for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69148 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2013 23:49:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69120 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2013 23:49:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69110 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2013 23:49:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:49:16 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:49:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9485) inconsistent defaults for hadoop.rpc.socket.factory.class.default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13635856#comment-13635856 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9485: ----------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12579448/HADOOP-9485.001.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestSaslRPC {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/2458//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/2458//console This message is automatically generated. > inconsistent defaults for hadoop.rpc.socket.factory.class.default > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-9485 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9485 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: net > Affects Versions: 2.0.5-beta > Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe > Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-9485.001.patch, HADOOP-9485.002.patch > > > In {{core-default.xml}}, {{hadoop.rpc.socket.factory.class.default}} defaults to {{org.apache.hadoop.net.StandardSocketFactory}}. However, in {{CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java}}, there is no default for this key. This is inconsistent (defaults in the code versus defaults in the XML files should match.) It also leads to problems with {{RemoteBlockReader2}}, since the default {{SocketFactory}} creates a {{Socket}} without an associated channel. {{RemoteBlockReader2}} cannot use such a {{Socket}}. > This bug only really becomes apparent when you create a {{Configuration}} using the {{Configuration(loadDefaults=true)}} constructor. Thanks to AB Srinivasan for his help in discovering this bug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira