hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9173) Add security token related to protobuf definition to hadoop-common
Date Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:42:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543622#comment-13543622
] 

Siddharth Seth commented on HADOOP-9173:
----------------------------------------

YARN side changes look good. Moving from "optional" to "required" on the yarn side shouldn't
cause problems.
This change ends up breaking the patch posted on YARN-50 though. If it's not an issue, I'd
prefer getting that patch in before making at least the YARN/MR side changes. Otherwise, I
can of-course re-base that patch.
Also, for a future jira, RequestDelegationTokenRequest, Response etc - could also be moved
to common.
                
> Add security token related to protobuf definition to hadoop-common
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9173
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9173
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.2-alpha
>            Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
>            Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9173.patch, HADOOP-9173.patch, HADOOP-9173.patch
>
>
> The same definition is repeated across HDFS, MR and YARN. We could use the protobuf definitions.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message