Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 049D697D7 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4490 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 18:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4252 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 18:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4062 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2012 18:10:10 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:10:10 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EF8142862 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:10:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Costin Leau (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <20529571.627.1344363010616.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <1205435518.116104.1343657854639.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8632) Configuration leaking class-loaders MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13430490#comment-13430490 ] Costin Leau commented on HADOOP-8632: ------------------------------------- @Robert My issue is not with the cache itself but with the leakage. If a client submits several big jobs, she has to either launch a new JVM for each submission or somehow patch the leak from outside. Or face OOM. Addressing this in the framework directly obviously is much better. @Todd Wrapping the value with a WeakReference probably it's the easiest solution since it doesn't introduce a new library dependency. It can later be upgraded to MapMaker if the pattern occurs often. > Configuration leaking class-loaders > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-8632 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8632 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha > Reporter: Costin Leau > > The newly introduced CACHE_CLASSES leaks class loaders causing associated classes to not be reclaimed. > One solution is to remove the cache itself since each class loader implementation caches the classes it loads automatically and preventing an exception from being raised is just a micro-optimization that, as one can tell, causes bugs instead of improving anything. > In fact, I would argue in a highly-concurrent environment, the weakhashmap synchronization/lookup probably costs more then creating the exception itself. > Another is to prevent the leak from occurring, by inserting the loadedclass into the WeakHashMap wrapped in a WeakReference. Otherwise the class has a strong reference to its classloader (the key) meaning neither gets GC'ed. > And since the cache_class is static, even if the originating Configuration instance gets GC'ed, its classloader won't. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira