Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:23:25 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Aaron T. Myers (Commented) (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <2125773485.25402.1332879805623.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <1536642090.32045.1332178657665.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8184) ProtoBuf RPC engine does not need
 it own reply packet - it can use the IPC layer reply packet.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13239906#comment-13239906 ] 

Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-8184:
----------------------------------------

bq. Sure, I will take a look.

Thanks a lot!

bq. We usually do not revert patches because of unit test failures.

In my experience we've often done this (see HADOOP-8193 for example) but if you'll look into it promptly then it seems fine not to.
                
> ProtoBuf RPC engine does not need it own reply packet - it can use the IPC layer reply packet.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-8184
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8184
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ipc
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Sanjay Radia
>             Fix For: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
>
>         Attachments: rpcFixPBHeader2.patch
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira