Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDEB29641 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43513 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2012 16:50:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43479 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2012 16:50:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43471 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2012 16:50:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:50:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:49:59 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888AD23C99 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:49:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj Das (Commented) (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <159569189.25327.1331916579572.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1926821649.52360.1329516777507.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8088) User-group mapping cache incorrectly does negative caching on transient failures MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13231371#comment-13231371 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-8088: ------------------------------------- The config for negative cache seems like an overkill. I'd suggest that we just handle the transient failures better. > User-group mapping cache incorrectly does negative caching on transient failures > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-8088 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0, 0.24.0, 0.23.1, 1.0.0, 1.1.0 > Reporter: Kihwal Lee > Fix For: 0.24.0, 1.1.0, 0.23.2 > > Attachments: hadoop-8088-branch-1.patch, hadoop-8088-trunk.patch, hadoop-8088-trunk.patch > > > We've seen a case where some getGroups() calls fail when the ldap server or the network is having transient failures. Looking at the code, the shell-based and the JNI-based implementations swallow exceptions and return an empty or partial list. The caller, Groups#getGroups() adds this likely empty list into the mapping cache for the user. This will function as negative caching until the cache expires. I don't think we want negative caching here, but even if we do, it should be intelligent enough to distinguish transient failures from ENOENT. The log message in the jni-based impl also needs an improvement. It should print what exception it encountered instead of just saying one happened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira