hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luke Lu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7601) Move common fs implementations to a hadoop-fs module
Date Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:53:09 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13095470#comment-13095470
] 

Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7601:
---------------------------------

bq. Asking for a default constructor for plugins is reasonable (and a common practice) request.

For plugin classes, yes. But not for things like FileSystem that was not built for plugin.
A provider class is nice plugin class.

> Move common fs implementations to a hadoop-fs module
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-7601
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7601
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fs
>            Reporter: Luke Lu
>             Fix For: 0.23.0
>
>
> Much of the hadoop-common dependencies is from the fs implementations. We have more fs
implementations on the way (ceph, lafs etc). I propose that we move all the fs implementations
to a hadoop-fs module under hadoop-common-project.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message