hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6910) Replace or merge Configuration with Jakarta Commons Configuration
Date Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:10:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12896957#action_12896957
] 

Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6910:
---------------------------------------

I'm certainly not a fan of the current Configuration class, but this change seems difficult
to pull off (with backwards compatibility) for pretty marginal gains.

What are the advantages of Jakarta configurations? Can they support the current xml format
or will you need to implement a new reader for them? Can it support final parameters? Are
all of their configurations guaranteed to be serializable? They have a put that takes Objects,
so how are those written in to XML or binary?

> Replace or merge Configuration with Jakarta Commons Configuration
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6910
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jeff Hammerbacher
>
> Jakarta Commons Configuration:  http://commons.apache.org/configuration/

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message