hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6884) Add LOG.isDebugEnabled() guard for each LOG.debug("...")
Date Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:32:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12899455#action_12899455
] 

Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6884:
------------------------------------------------

{code}
int a = ...;
long b = ...;
double c = ...;
LOG.debug("a=" + a + ", b=" + b + ", c=" + c);
{code}
If I understand the slf4j API correctly, slf4j does not really help for the codes above. 
It has to create Integer, Long and  Double objects for the primitive data type and an array
for vararg.

> Add LOG.isDebugEnabled() guard for each LOG.debug("...")
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6884
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0
>            Reporter: Erik Steffl
>            Assignee: Erik Steffl
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-6884-0.22-1.patch, HADOOP-6884-0.22.patch
>
>
> Each LOG.debug("...") should be executed only if LOG.isDebugEnabled() is true, in some
cases it's expensive to construct the string that is being printed to log. It's much easier
to always use LOG.isDebugEnabled() because it's easier to check (rather than in each case
reason whether it's necessary or not).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message