hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vinod K V (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6818) Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider
Date Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:18:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878376#action_12878376
] 

Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-6818:
-----------------------------------

Just a QQ. Is this a duplicate of HADOOP-4998? Or alteast forward compatible?

Lots of ideas floated around there, it'd be good if these two issues are in agreement.

> Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6818
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Devaraj Das
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: JNIGroupMapping.patch
>
>
> The default implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider does a fork of a unix command
to get the groups of a user. Since the group resolution happens in the servers, this might
be costly. This jira aims at providing a JNI-based implementation for GroupMappingServiceProvider.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message