Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52481 invoked from network); 20 May 2010 23:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 May 2010 23:58:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 48963 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 23:58:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48849 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 23:58:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48841 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2010 23:58:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 23:58:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1450.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 23:58:38 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4KNwHik006128 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 23:58:17 GMT Message-ID: <18745353.9161274399897649.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:58:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6775) Update Hadoop Common Site's In-Reply-To: <5305625.23361274301713697.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6775?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D128= 69814#action_12869814 ]=20 Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6775: -------------------------------------- I was planning to add the following item to the FAQ section. Would this add= ress your comment? How does the classification relate to the Java's visibility declaration? Java allows public, private and protected declarations.=20 =E2=80=A2=09A java-private element is always audience-private. =E2=80=A2=09An audience-public element is always java-public; the reverse i= s not always true. One is often forced to make an API java-public to allow = related packages to access the API. Such java-public APIs may be classified= as audience-limited-private or even audience-private.=20 =E2=80=A2=09A java-protected element may be audience-private (for internal = sub-classing within an implementation), or audience-public if it is intende= d for general use (as with HDFS's AbstractFileSystem class).=20 =E2=80=A2=09If JSR-294 completes (currently inactive) it will likely help i= n aligning our classification with the Java visibility rules: it appears th= at one of the goals of the JSR-294 is to better deal with visibility across= peer-packages; this would allow us to capture most of the use cases for li= mited-private. > Update Hadoop Common Site's=20 > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6775 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6775 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: site > > Attachments: api_classification.pdf, siteCLassification.patch, si= teCLassification2.patch, siteCLassification3.patch > > > Add documentation on our interface classification scheme to thew common s= ite. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.