hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Neil Bliss (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem
Date Tue, 04 May 2010 18:24:08 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863928#action_12863928
] 

Neil Bliss commented on HADOOP-6704:
------------------------------------

I ran findbugs locally before submitting the -4 version of the patch, and it came back clean.
 I can't help but wonder why I'm seeing different results from Hudson.  The findbugs complaint
is now that I don't have ChunkInfo.hashCode() implemented.  I'll implement that, and resubmit
to see what Hudson has to say then.

> add support for Parascale filesystem
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6704
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: fs
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.2
>            Reporter: Neil Bliss
>             Fix For: 0.20.3
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-6704-2.patch, HADOOP-6704-3.patch, HADOOP-6704-4.patch, HADOOP-6704.0.20.2.patch,
HADOOP-6704.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 168h
>  Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use
Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters.  We'd like to contribute this work to the community.
Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message