Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25382 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 69329 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69293 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69285 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1278.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:41:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DHfSRM023245 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:41:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <27363908.51701271180488589.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:41:28 -0400 (EDT) From: "eric baldeschwieler (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856512#action_12856512 ] eric baldeschwieler commented on HADOOP-6659: --------------------------------------------- If we can get to agreement that the current RPC remains the default and that IDL work happens in a branch and that only after we have a reasonably complete backwards compat solution do we change to AVRO RPC by default, then I think we are good. My concern is not with the already committed plugability, but with the change of the default RPC and incremental change over of the protocols. Once that work starts, we are committed to finishing it and we can not do that in the timeframe of the next release IMO. I'd love to be proven wrong in a branch... Would we keep the plugable API once we make the transition? Seems like plugable support of an IDL driven RPC will be hard / not valuable. Thoughts? > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira