hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6592) Scheduler: Pause button desirable
Date Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:46:28 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837379#action_12837379
] 

Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-6592:
---------------------------------------

Hi Adam,

The fair scheduler and capacity scheduler can be used to better share a cluster between large
and small jobs. Instead of running jobs in FIFO order as the default scheduler does, they
allow each job to have a certain share of the slots in the cluster. For example, if your cluster
has 1000 slots, and you submit 1 job, it gets all the slots; but if you then submit a second
job, each job's share becomes 500 slots (as tasks from job 1 finish, their slots are given
to job 2). These schedulers work quite well when tasks are relatively short (10 seconds to
a minute); a new job can get slots within a few seconds. The only case when you may need to
do something beyond waiting for existing tasks to finish is when all your reduce slots are
filled by long reduce slots, but for this case, the fair scheduler at least supports preemption
in 0.21 and trunk (I believe the capacity scheduler had it in earlier versions but has now
removed it; I could be wrong about that though).

> Scheduler: Pause button desirable
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6592
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6592
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Adam Kramer
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It would be lovely if, from the jobtracker page, I could click a button that's not "kill"
or "fail" but ..."pause."
> The pause button would stop a certain task from starting any more mappers or reducers.
They would all wait in the "pending" stage until the job is "un-paused." Currently-running
tasks would continue to run, and then complete, thus freeing the resources for other jobs.
> This would help a lot for systems (esp. Hive) in which one or two jobs are hogging a
lot of mappers or reducers. The ones they have would finish, and then other jobs could "catch
up," and then they could be unpaused for a while. This would also allow for user-level throttling
of their jobs in instances where they need a lot of resources but have the time to spare.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message