Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21065 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2009 03:50:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2009 03:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 19289 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 03:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19200 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 03:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19181 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2009 03:50:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:50:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:50:38 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD54B234C045 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:50:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <987859490.1261367418693.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:50:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6444) Support additional security group option in hadoop-ec2 script In-Reply-To: <923480243.1260939018250.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793071#action_12793071 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6444: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12428594/hadoop-trunk-contrib-cloud.patch against trunk revision 892113. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/227/console This message is automatically generated. > Support additional security group option in hadoop-ec2 script > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6444 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6444 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/ec2 > Reporter: Paul Egan > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-ec2-py-0.3.0.patch, hadoop-trunk-contrib-cloud.patch, hadoop-trunk-contrib-cloud.patch > > > When deploying a hadoop cluster on ec2 alongside other services it is very useful to be able to specify additional (pre-existing) security groups to facilitate access control. For example one could use this feature to add a cluster to a generic "hadoop" group, which authorizes hdfs access from instances outside the cluster. Without such an option the access control for the security groups created by the script need to manually updated after cluster launch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.