hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "hadoopguy (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6302) Move FileSystem and all of the implementations to HDFS project
Date Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:38:31 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763734#action_12763734
] 

hadoopguy commented on HADOOP-6302:
-----------------------------------

I strongly agree with Gregory. Moving the FileSystem and FileContext into HDFS is not clean
for other filesystem implementors. HDFS is one implementation of the FileSystem API - lets
keep it separate.
Also won't the pain of the patches get reduced as we are striving hard to make the FileSystem
API ready as 1.0  ?

> Move FileSystem and all of the implementations to HDFS project
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6302
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6302
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> Currently, the FileSystem and FileContext classes are in Common and the primary implementation
is in HDFS. That means that many patches span between the subprojects. I think it will reduce
the pain if we move FileSystem and the dependent classes into HDFS.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message