[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763734#action_12763734
]
hadoopguy commented on HADOOP-6302:
-----------------------------------
I strongly agree with Gregory. Moving the FileSystem and FileContext into HDFS is not clean
for other filesystem implementors. HDFS is one implementation of the FileSystem API - lets
keep it separate.
Also won't the pain of the patches get reduced as we are striving hard to make the FileSystem
API ready as 1.0 ?
> Move FileSystem and all of the implementations to HDFS project
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6302
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6302
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Owen O'Malley
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> Currently, the FileSystem and FileContext classes are in Common and the primary implementation
is in HDFS. That means that many patches span between the subprojects. I think it will reduce
the pain if we move FileSystem and the dependent classes into HDFS.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
|