hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "hadoopguy (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6302) Move FileSystem and all of the implementations to HDFS project
Date Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:38:31 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763734#action_12763734

hadoopguy commented on HADOOP-6302:

I strongly agree with Gregory. Moving the FileSystem and FileContext into HDFS is not clean
for other filesystem implementors. HDFS is one implementation of the FileSystem API - lets
keep it separate.
Also won't the pain of the patches get reduced as we are striving hard to make the FileSystem
API ready as 1.0  ?

> Move FileSystem and all of the implementations to HDFS project
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-6302
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6302
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
> Currently, the FileSystem and FileContext classes are in Common and the primary implementation
is in HDFS. That means that many patches span between the subprojects. I think it will reduce
the pain if we move FileSystem and the dependent classes into HDFS.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message