hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Zeller (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5073) Hadoop 1.0 Interface Classification - scope (visibility - public/private) and stability
Date Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:23:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12747718#action_12747718
] 

Bill Zeller commented on HADOOP-5073:
-------------------------------------

If all methods of a subclass are not explicitly documented, I worry that it will become difficult
to program against the code directly (without looking at generated javadoc). For example,
I imagine needing to trace a method's ancestors or class hierarchy to determine its classification.
Would it be too difficult or bloated to add public/stable (etc) to every applicable method?

> Hadoop 1.0 Interface Classification - scope (visibility - public/private) and stability
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-5073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Sanjay Radia
>         Attachments: 5073_demo.png, HADOOP-5073.patch
>
>
> This jira proposes an interface classification for hadoop interfaces.
> The discussion was started in email alias core-dev@hadoop.apache.org in Nov 2008.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message