Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E75200CF8 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:47:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 93B421609CD; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D8BD61609C6 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:47:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 4244 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2017 21:47:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3798 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2017 21:47:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:47:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 43F6BC36C2 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:47:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzJFSUof_bMl for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C6A0D60E1B for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c80so671158lfh.0 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:47:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XlRSDqVwbqOdqPqVspsSPkP3kxujvY17TtSBHzLa9h0=; b=qx5ZGeICrYCj7VsL1rN4syKIrXGSY3NJsP++Otv8+TAPhcpxeNHbDH1nbE3d5kLOnG SKmymx/T7ok4apa81KAgkvAY1ZAldJpChlb7VhKYSJvWiVYXkBC3j3Fbjnewj6oe0Tp9 D1DHe5WdVGwGD/zw9oxLCfRq3EO2j+p2mnqqKJiGAz4Bdp2oPt6gnhjqgTxI5rDN8en+ W0SXVaCa3Otz/SsRryA/68S2UcDOMDXoilm8/os/7k2wJyNZaoRSMSeq1ma79cm1Dwr7 tkYP8eySo87i2TDKiKLzwDwsWE4lk3cf4/jIOWT9YzQcOsaELqkXn1rzjVuP1mgrfY6A ztjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XlRSDqVwbqOdqPqVspsSPkP3kxujvY17TtSBHzLa9h0=; b=Xd27ve7uvoz0phZ17GHe+tK/hS0eqXt9+C96L/hiSC+olts/Ide51cudCiXPN/1Cv7 P9ADY6JKnrV4YyMTyHZKqBT4FMpMkwKEdbWiEKvIjjPerMD/02OW3E1bX12lZVyzBio5 rAqvG/8k/K/G2faUxZ+El0CfETS36QVGU5LmRnZg7TI5NsEIB6okvV0VbN8hF5SEcmTR EgCnQFe30NAFMyiQFYLL/qYfShIjUC2OlKQe2DI5kaCVSnH1ix8/AKGqzqbRw3M1EJu+ 9kjsk48NodZKKfKNJoeJT4EAkZsyNnul/A4rxTx3dC+ydw4m5l1OUibdhxb8A+r9121u 4NIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUg7Alcud7Y6L+DROFTkEgaaJKJOrHMx3ZkcDKQnrtvLn4gzwLGF H/hT9RG3YIJlw2hZosXDGi8bCBm+DUQJ0GyDODFZTFe9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBwWZ5AW7fBup57/M2lwLrivklqp6EI5Bliyf86FSA5W6si2lWBXRXmfOFhKoHfnGVJPT1YWpAlQOQIC2v97vE= X-Received: by 10.25.26.130 with SMTP id a124mr7414444lfa.28.1505425663574; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:47:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.227.11 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:47:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <752B0E31-9263-431B-AD83-B7C298E14F07@effectivemachines.com> From: Sean Busbey Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:47:22 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Can we make our precommit test robust to dependency changes while staying usable? To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114024eee9f8a205592d3973" archived-at: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:47:49 -0000 --001a114024eee9f8a205592d3973 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > > > > > I discussed this on yetus-dev a while back and Allen thought it'd be > non-trivial: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/552ad614d1b3d5226a656b60c01084 > 57bcaa1219fb9ad985f8750ba1@%3Cdev.yetus.apache.org%3E > > I unfortunately don't have the test-patch.sh expertise to dig into this. > > > Hurm. getting something generic certainly sounds like a lot of work, but getting something that works specifically with Maven maybe not. lemme see if I can describe what I think the pieces look like in a jira. --001a114024eee9f8a205592d3973--