Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGi=jZB5vkuiTNwN3U1jr8z+=ow8RVhXmZbaeoZr3i7uiqdTEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGB5D2YewMMqJZ_WqyigH2pykMHkpwBzz8r7rYpW7M=iJXkOAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <37D9CB65-78FF-4699-B0AD-881F7F131ED0@effectivemachines.com>
 <CAMqJVeO35YbNKswRCCF8eRLia8Bq7XdXMBk=Vtvq00UKCY=mMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <C0EFB928-77C2-4817-8C0C-BBD917BF1306@effectivemachines.com>
 <CAMqJVeMqrtL_2XBtTA-S-KqL5gqw8YXv=_pSQDV7YbxG-gRvuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CEF154E7-210E-4F79-8597-C3972D354ABF@effectivemachines.com>
 <1503960481.3964846.1087888872.43777CF0@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <CAGB5D2ZwP5azrGk_X45742UXz3O53+=kThvb7EBgFW4MR5nFeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGi=jZB5vkuiTNwN3U1jr8z+=ow8RVhXmZbaeoZr3i7uiqdTEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vrushali C <vrushalic2016@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:51:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE=b_fYmPV1K=kLm9FYh+PRry-+ewkwFAcjXifDN3mNr5ad_+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Branches and versions for Hadoop 3
To: Rohith Sharma K S <rohithsharmaks@apache.org>
Cc: Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com>,
	"common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
	"mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
	"hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
	"yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>, wheeleast@gmail.com, varunsaxena@apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11460604a4e91f0557e80e65"
archived-at: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:51:31 -0000

--001a11460604a4e91f0557e80e65
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Andrew,
As Rohith mentioned, if you are good with it, from the TSv2 side, we are
ready to go for merge tonight itself (Pacific time)  right after the voting
period ends. Varun Saxena has been diligently rebasing up until now so most
likely our merge should be reasonably straightforward.

@Wangda: your resource profile vote ends tomorrow, could we please
coordinate our merges?

thanks
Vrushali


On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Rohith Sharma K S <
rohithsharmaks@apache.org> wrote:

> On 29 August 2017 at 06:24, Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > So far I've seen no -1's to the branching proposal, so I plan to execute
> > this tomorrow unless there's further feedback.
> >
> For on going branch merge threads i.e TSv2, voting will be closing
> tomorrow. Does it end up in merging into trunk(3.1.0-SNAPSHOT) and
> branch-3.0(3.0.0-beta1-SNAPSHOT) ? If so, would you be able to wait for
> couple of more days before creating branch-3.0 so that TSv2 branch merge
> would be done directly to trunk?
>
>
>
> >
> > Regarding the above discussion, I think Jason and I have essentially the
> > same opinion.
> >
> > I hope that keeping trunk a release branch means a higher bar for merges
> > and code review in general. In the past, I've seen some patches committed
> > to trunk-only as a way of passing responsibility to a future user or
> > reviewer. That doesn't help anyone; patches should be committed with the
> > intent of running them in production.
> >
> > I'd also like to repeat the above thanks to the many, many contributors
> > who've helped with release improvements. Allen's work on create-release
> and
> > automated changes and release notes were essential, as was Xiao's work on
> > LICENSE and NOTICE files. I'm also looking forward to Marton's site
> > improvements, which addresses one of the remaining sore spots in the
> > release process.
> >
> > Things have gotten smoother with each alpha we've done over the last
> year,
> > and it's a testament to everyone's work that we have a good probability
> of
> > shipping beta and GA later this year.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andrew
> >
> >
>

--001a11460604a4e91f0557e80e65--