Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E584E200C02 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:39:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E41D2160B48; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 98D8B160B34 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:39:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 80284 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2017 22:39:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80271 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2017 22:39:23 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:39:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A5303C0511 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:39:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.999 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3f7dZJhEKJ0 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com (mail-vk0-f43.google.com [209.85.213.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 736AA5F367 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id r136so59250870vke.1 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:39:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5p8pV3B0r34SZpMhu2W7SgtgELOgOhSdGN3/iHdVjZw=; b=qG3oHc+ivNm1eBfwCNE0s8HdZF0W1Qjy0qKeKrC1x8OJEhC5cn21WIZXnigHPmhPaz f923gey50hFoWg2tMwD/wDeqN5iWvW+N+d+KoZNvqYNltI+8fObswVfPUWdGH6ekWQea BYD+mzh2ddqewtzxm+eUSznKPYDFxV2hDrKbKVJf0sFOHhFIyR7aWRhHNy3PMlGtODZw QRQb5HsndJr13bVG9NuyFeXX+m5+mpEjJI4RCFXd7MGw7bh9ot3TDsqT8LES+4uAQmFd M8Oqv1/ip9HsfhAa81WenFysjwQEexjC8dh3RCCTp0EjlnTiM82y6d1WQpj4iDKbRg2X pXNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5p8pV3B0r34SZpMhu2W7SgtgELOgOhSdGN3/iHdVjZw=; b=V+M1kIiosVBjsPkZ0op9dupWJwyyy51qNKsQWckXmj0ghkl2UOqw6aJ3ltNDQnz2sY dth2eCyf1TtRyr7QxqqUfOJKOsH5bIPwVv4zha2i36/qSu5vJH7seftWT9BBIcQn1Ddb tgnv3xw07i/sUZ31yb4E12SDnZBJORg3rvfpw+d/JwSiL5rABaBdH+RBYiiSYTDWI+4a HFbZagcUIDsIHZVf9TyRuTdL6+4Ian3g/xu3wbXBndIT2WXzIydVBfY4gaEoRvYTKZGp WYTzPtu7V2ptstLWz8pqogEzlslLc7P65ymFv4eOAuxWJxaHwaQTOMe1Fj1KTZ/uENEc +HDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIcntOuXK/9TqwZgkK2UCC9CK8JSCk5AEayOqAaNY9oJs9h2eWEE8zo8kKyAbhNG7E9o5fH81z5ASkcbLvk X-Received: by 10.31.254.198 with SMTP id l189mr8117773vki.86.1484951956793; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:39:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.65.66 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:38:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B44247B-AFB2-4803-BDB0-251A8270F98C@apache.org> <2F9B8811-8240-454A-8599-64BE4B15CE2F@apache.org> <7CCEC640-5BCA-4ECC-976B-8630F4C0DD72@apache.org> <33841919-A63C-40BC-992D-9B98424BFBFC@hortonworks.com> <09457A47-B7F1-49C0-96CF-AA2AB07C6E2A@hortonworks.com> <5AD22D82-0F7C-4443-8FBB-B1295CB5707D@apache.org> <1480481443907.45579@hortonworks.com> <1480550805462.62858@hortonworks.com> <1480612149466.84413@hortonworks.com> <1481139119727.18762@hortonworks.com> <1483523074647.66672@hortonworks.com> <1484782008179.66066@hortonworks.com> <1484880409796.52924@hortonworks.com> <1484906644229.42595@hortonworks.com> <1484939530068.17083@hortonworks.com> From: Andrew Wang Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:38:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities To: Junping Du Cc: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c14ae8ae4c9c105468e51c1 archived-at: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:39:26 -0000 --94eb2c14ae8ae4c9c105468e51c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After some googling, I discovered we need the sign profile to make deploy work: mvn deploy -Psign -DskipTests -DskipShading Updated HowToRelease accordingly. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Wang wrote: > What I meant is that you can mvn deploy the specific missing files to fix > up the repo state. Though we should also figure out why the deploy plugin > didn't pick up the signature files the first time. > > Best, > Andrew > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Junping Du wrote: > >> Yes. I did maven deploy in root directory before close the staging >> repository. If this is the only suspect, I can drop the repository and d= o >> mvn deploy again. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Junping >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Andrew Wang >> *Sent:* Friday, January 20, 2017 10:48 AM >> *To:* Junping Du >> *Cc:* common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> >> *Subject:* Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >> >> You can check the error message by clicking on it, a bunch like this: >> >> Missing Signature: '/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-map >> reduce-client-jobclient/2.8.0/hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-2.8.0-te= sts.jar.asc' >> does not exist for 'hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-2.8.0-tests.jar'. >> >> Did you maven deploy all the signature files? >> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Junping Du wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I have successfully built the release bit on branch-2.8.0 by >>> following: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease step by step. >>> However, when try to close the "Staging Repositories" at Nexus page ( >>> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories), I found our >>> repository - orgapachehadoop-1051 cannot be closed due to some signatur= e >>> validation failed and one Apache rule failed. I never met this problem >>> before in previous releasing 2.6.3 and 2.6.4. Is this related to our re= cent >>> changes on release process/tools (docker based)? Any ideas or thoughts = on >>> how to fix the problem? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Junping >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Junping Du >>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:46 PM >>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Cc: Varun Vasudev >>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> >>> According to Varun's offline email, the security fixes has landed on >>> branch-2, 2.8 and 2.8.0 branch. >>> I was kicking off a new RC build (RC1), and will publish it for vote >>> soon. In the mean time, please mark fix version as 2.8.1 for any new >>> commits landed on branch-2.8, and don't commit anything to branch-2.8.0= at >>> this moment. Thanks! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Junping >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Junping Du >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:26 PM >>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Cc: Varun Vasudev >>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> In the passed one or two weeks, we found some new blockers get >>> coming on branch-2.8, like: YARN-6068 (log aggregation get stuck when N= M >>> restart with work preserving enabled) and YARN-6072 (RM unable to start= in >>> secure mode). Both of them are fixed now (YARN-6072 is fixed by Ajith a= nd I >>> fixed YARN-6068), and I was starting the RC build process since early t= his >>> week. As we have significant build tools/process change (docker based) >>> since 2.8 comparing with 2.6/2.7, it takes me a while to get familiar w= ith >>> it and finally get a successful build on 2.8.0-RC0 last night. >>> I already push RC0 tag into public which is prerequisite step >>> before RC voting. However, in the mean while, I was pinged by Varun >>> Vasudev that there are a known vulnerability issues on container_execut= or >>> get identified and discussed in hadoop security email threads - looks l= ike >>> YARN-5704 fixed part of it, but left part - the privilege escalation vi= a >>> /proc/self/environ is not fixed yet. So most likely, I have to withdraw= our >>> 2.8.0 RC0 although I haven't announced it public for vote yet. I will w= ait >>> this issue get fixed to prepare a new release candidate. As RC0 tag can= not >>> be reverted after push into apache, our next release candidate will sta= rt >>> from RC1. >>> As I mentioned in early email, 2.8.0 is a very big release (2300+ >>> commits since 2.7.3) and I am glad that we are almost there. Thanks >>> everyone for being patient and contributing our release work. Please le= t me >>> know if you have more comments or suggestions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Junping >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Junping Du >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 1:41 AM >>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> >>> Hi all Hadoopers, >>> I just commit YARN-3866 which is the last blocker for branch-2.8, >>> so since tomorrow I will kick off process to prepare the first RC for o= ur >>> 2.8.0 release. This release will include at least 2374 commits that nev= er >>> landed before in previous 2.x releases. Please check >>> https://s.apache.org/RW5k for details. There are also 352 fixes marked >>> in 2.7.1, 2.7.2 and 2.7.3 but not marked with 2.8 ( >>> https://s.apache.org/RKti) that I need to double check all are landed >>> in branch-2.8 and fix the versions before kicking off the first RC. >>> Our progress is slightly behind my estimation weeks ago. However, >>> considering we just go through holidays and Jenkins cleanup issues ling= er >>> on for several projects (YARN, etc.), our achievement here is still gre= at! >>> Thanks everyone for keep calm and carry on the help for the release. Ku= dos >>> to Wangda, Jian, Akira, Jason, Sangjin, Karthik and all for pushing har= d on >>> blockers during this time. Also, special thanks to Vinod and Andrew for >>> sharing knowledge and practice (include scripts for auto version check)= for >>> releasing effort. >>> Will try to prepare RC0 of 2.8 release for vote within this week. >>> Stay tuned! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Junping >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Junping Du >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 11:31 AM >>> To: Akira Ajisaka; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> >>> Thanks Akira for reporting this. Actually, HADOOP-2.8-JACC worked well >>> for several runs before last weekend, but it get failed for latest seve= ral >>> runs, probably affected by recently Jenkins down. >>> However, from my recent manual kick off, it seems to be good again: >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-2.8-JACC/9/. >>> I will keep an eye for today's nightly run to see if it back to normal. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Junping >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Akira Ajisaka >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 12:12 AM >>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> >>> Thanks Junping and Andrew! >>> >>> HADOOP-2.8-JACC is not working well, so I manually kicked a job to >>> compare 2.8 with 2.7.3. >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-tr >>> unk-JACC/24/artifact/target/compat-check/report.html >>> >>> Regards, >>> Akira >>> >>> On 2016/12/02 2:08, Junping Du wrote: >>> > Thanks Andrew! That's also a nice suggestion. I already create a >>> similar job: https://builds.apache.org/view >>> /H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-2.8-JACC/ for 2.8 and kick off several runs >>> manually. Will monitor incompatible status from there. >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > >>> > Junping >>> > >>> > >>> > ________________________________ >>> > From: Andrew Wang >>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:18 PM >>> > To: Junping Du >>> > Cc: Sangjin Lee; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod Vavilapalli; Jian He; Wangda Tan; >>> sjlee@twitter.com >>> > Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> > >>> > I recommend giving the JACC report another look. I set up a >>> parameterized jenkins job which you can trigger manually for branch-2.8= : >>> > >>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-trunk-JACC/ >>> > >>> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Junping Du >> > wrote: >>> > Hi Sangjin and all, >>> > >>> > That sounds good. If anyone have priority fix to backport , >>> please nominate it by following this email thread or ping me on JIRA >>> directly. And I agree that we should keep in mind that our bar for 2.8 >>> release should be high now as we want to move quickly on this release. >>> Non-critical fixes can wait for next one. >>> > >>> > Any other comments and suggestions? >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > >>> > Junping >>> > >>> > >>> > ________________________________ >>> > From: sjlee0@gmail.com >> > on behalf of Sangjin Lee >> > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:24 PM >>> > To: Junping Du >>> > Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org= ; >>> hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>> mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org= ; >>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod >>> Vavilapalli; Jian He; Wangda Tan; sjlee@twitter.com>> @twitter.com> >>> > Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> > >>> > Thanks for picking this up Junping! >>> > >>> > I heard on email threads and offline discussions that there may be >>> interests in porting some fixes from branch-2 to branch-2.8. I still fe= el >>> that the bar should be pretty high to do that, but it might be good to = have >>> folks suggest some critical fixes that need to be released sooner. Thou= ghts? >>> > >>> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Junping Du >> >> tonworks.com>>> wrote: >>> > Hi folks, >>> > Per asked by Vinod offline, I would like to continue the effort >>> to push 2.8 release out in next several weeks. The plan is as following= : >>> > - We only have 5 blockers and 3 critical issues ( >>> https://s.apache.org/6kwx) so far, and most of them are in good >>> progress now. I put them all on apache ciwiki ( >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+2.8+Release) >>> and will do daily monitor and update on these issues in next couple of >>> weeks. >>> > - When all blocker/critical issues are gone (target EOD is Dec. >>> 10), I will push out all major/minor issues that is open. So if you are >>> working on some major issues and target for release in 2.8, please keep >>> track of our release status and your work progress. >>> > - I will create RC immediately once our 2.8 target issues are >>> clean (especially for blocker and critical issues) for voting process. >>> > >>> > I hope we can make it within year 2016, best before Xmas holiday= . >>> And I need help from all of you. :) >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Junping >>> > >>> > ________________________________________ >>> > From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >> odkv@apache.org>>> >>> > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 2:57 PM >>> > To: Jian He >>> > Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>> apache.org>>> preduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>>; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>>; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>> hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>>> hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>>; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>> common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>>> > >>> > Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities >>> > >>> > Thanks for all that great help moving this release forward, Jian, >>> Sangjin, Wangda et al! Appreciate it. >>> > >>> > The License / Notice fix is finally in. And I pushed out a 2.7.3 RC0 >>> last week. >>> > >>> > I only see 9 blocker / critical fixes pending for 2.8.0 - >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=3D12334985. Let=E2=80=99s= do this! >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > +Vinod >>> > >>> >> On May 11, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Jian He >> e@hortonworks.com>>> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> For MapReduce/YARN, I closed a few staled ones. Only 4 jiras needs >>> attention for 2.8 >>> >> >>> >> MAPREDUCE-6288 >>> >> YARN-1815 >>> >> YARN-4685 >>> >> YARN-4844 >>> >> >>> >> The rest are either improvements or long-standing issues and does no= t >>> qualify release blocker, IMO. >>> >> I think we=E2=80=99ll try to get these 4 jiras in asap. The rest wil= l be on >>> best effort, resolve as much as possible and move them out if not resol= ved >>> in time. >>> >> >>> >> Jian >>> >> >>> >> On May 11, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Wangda Tan >> wheeleast@gmail.com>>> st@gmail.com>>>> >>>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Sounds good to me :). >>> >> >>> >> Jian and I have looked at all existing 2.8.0 blockers and criticals >>> today. >>> >> To me more than half of MR/YARN blockers/criticals of 2.8 should be >>> moved >>> >> out. Left comments on these JIRAs asked original owners, plan to >>> update >>> >> target version of these JIRAs early next week. >>> >> >>> >> Will keep this thread updated. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Wangda >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Sangjin Lee >> >> sjlee@apache.org>>>> >>>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> How about this? I'll review the HADOOP/HDFS bugs in that list to com= e >>> up >>> >> with true blockers for 2.8.0 or JIRAs that are close to being ready. >>> I'll >>> >> report the list here. Then folks can chime in if you agree >>> >> >>> >> Perhaps Wangda, you can go over the YARN/MR bugs. Sound like a plan? >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Sangjin >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Wangda Tan >> >> st@gmail.com>>>> >>>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1, we should close such staled JIRAs to avoid doing unnecessary >>> checks >>> >> for >>> >> every releases. >>> >> >>> >> I'm working on reviewing YARN/MR critical/blocker patches currently, >>> it >>> >> gonna very helpful if someone else can help with reviewing Common/HD= FS >>> >> JIRAs. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Wangda >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sangjin Lee >> >> sjlee@apache.org>>>> >>>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Where do we stand in terms of closing out blocker/critical issues fo= r >>> >> 2.8.0? I still see 50 open JIRAs in Vinod's list: >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=3D12334985 >>> >> >>> >> But I see a lot of JIRAs with no patches or very stale patches. It >>> >> would be >>> >> a good exercise to come up with the list of JIRAs that we need to >>> block >>> >> 2.8.0 for and focus our attention on closing them out. Thoughts? >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Sangjin >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Steve Loughran < >>> stevel@hortonworks.com>> stevel@hortonworks.com>>> stevel@hortonworks.com>> stevel@hortonworks.com>> >>> >> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 23 Apr 2016, at 01:24, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >>> >> vinodkv@apache.org>> @apache.org>>> >> vinodkv@apache.org>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> We are not converging - there=E2=80=99s still 58 more. I need help f= rom the >>> >> community in addressing / review 2.8.0 blockers. If folks can start >>> >> with >>> >> reviewing Patch available tickets, that=E2=80=99ll be great. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I'm still doing the s3a stuff, other people testing and reviewing th= is >>> >> stuff welcome. >>> >> >>> >> in particular, I could do with others playing with this patch of min= e, >>> >> which adds counters and things into S3a, based on the azure >>> >> instrumentation >>> >> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13028 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>> yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>>> yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>> unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >> lp@hadoop.apache.org> >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> >> mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>> mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >> apreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org>> help@hadoop.apache.org>> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> >>> >> > --94eb2c14ae8ae4c9c105468e51c1--