Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AC5200BBB for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:56:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AF609160B01; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id CF466160AF6 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:56:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 22766 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2016 07:56:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22749 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2016 07:56:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:56:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CC12AC0D8D for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:56:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.78 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrH1iuP0y1tk for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com (mail-it0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 96F365FAE5 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q124so23537392itd.1 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:56:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JK8dDJuktxLVx4chPAVqp+zxxYNVKqMfeJeWXM3CdCA=; b=sjeDD6542JxJGoHuVPTkRhbuuBiUf2o7fk1q/5Q4lmIhe07jYWcpwprNyAakOY/Lm7 XYJUBdQFKIf5QS8rUTo0abaRxNvC+bi+1kQx8mVzC4uoJ45eDNPJEwiuNuUc6vUAQDr5 LaeR2/pWk7axx1orXjsj6wdEsrDaBH9j4A/a2cWqPIDq3ZQMHvY+y5Isfdkt28JODI8C TFfJZofRfEBQiwBKwyOhkhavQ1GuvXh1cAchPz8zCBmP/L6F8Y9N7g8MZXTqShekfkyf JCYYO8F9tsmb1OpQLSzrNJ9zgCuA2OMLCuWwiFNqLLyepFuCNx5lLuqll9+eb9RQ7A6j D3xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JK8dDJuktxLVx4chPAVqp+zxxYNVKqMfeJeWXM3CdCA=; b=CUhJhuRFNQxYCqfUN1biOnwNLjbAK70nJI75w0WRMNGv0wEPDd+oOaivFluMdaP79X a37WQQaHamfioNidFinGq5tHEMr1+/+JrMSZzzuI5nsMcbeDPuYM3ftuQP+f/ozftnyl R96imaip5Kjd+Ur+8JRApY9bWXlfNG3k/xEQPcM98uoC7a+KGeC5qiuSUF+y1mgagIeS JxL2JH2reffB2EV0UUou/eExyFjlGtSBrsEyRXwsJdwJsB8T8SrgssHb63tyVRSK2kF2 Jm7z0cUKSBvR0sUwo18OgYhBgo/GDJM7aRVhBmR/9k6u+IcDa8PbXA2OAYtjIziiYe1Y GoWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc0ByeSjC6z14TAfgjQ8/qh6ecLw4lgAbJKyOb7uHdsJz/x1xYMOQJ56aB9n8WpZk2NA70J5QNgXTja/q7w X-Received: by 10.157.39.33 with SMTP id r30mr1522277ota.168.1478764591072; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:56:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.236.228 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:56:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8AD4EE147886274A8B495D6AF407DF698F17AC45@blreml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <2097738183.493992.1478299136472@mail.yahoo.com> From: Karthik Kambatla Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:56:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updated 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT artifact To: Ming Ma Cc: Sangjin Lee , Jason Lowe , Akira Ajisaka , Brahma Reddy Battula , Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142d204286a490540edb692 archived-at: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:56:42 -0000 --001a1142d204286a490540edb692 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If there is interest in releasing off of branch-2.8, we should definitely do that. As Sangjin mentioned, there might be value in doing 2.9 off branch-2 too. How do we go about maintenance releases along those minor lines, and when would we discontinue 2.6.x/2.7.x releases? On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Ming Ma wrote: > I would also prefer releasing current 2.8 branch sooner. There are several > incomplete features in branch-2 such as YARN-914 and HDFS-7877 that are > better served if we can complete them in the next major release. Letting > them span across multiple releases might not be desirable as there could be > some potential compatibility issues involved. Therefore if we recut 2.8 it > means we have to work on those items before the new 2.8 is released which > could cause major delay on the schedule. > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > >> +1. Resetting the 2.8 effort and the branch at this point may be >> counter-productive. IMO we should focus on resolving the remaining >> blockers >> and getting it out the door. I also think that we should seriously >> consider >> 2.9 as well, as a fairly large number of changes have accumulated in >> branch-2 (over branch-2.8). >> >> >> Sangjin >> >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jason Lowe >> wrote: >> >> > At this point my preference would be to do the most expeditious thing to >> > release 2.8, whether that's sticking with the branch-2.8 we have today >> or >> > re-cutting it on branch-2. Doing a quick JIRA query, there's been >> almost >> > 2,400 JIRAs resolved in 2.8.0 (1). For many of them, it's well-past >> time >> > they saw a release vehicle. If re-cutting the branch means we have to >> wrap >> > up a few extra things that are still in-progress on branch-2 or add a >> few >> > more blockers to the list before we release then I'd rather stay where >> > we're at and ship it ASAP. >> > >> > Jason >> > (1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in% >> > 20%28hadoop%2C%20yarn%2C%20mapreduce%2C%20hdfs%29% >> > 20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.8.0 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 5:31 PM, Karthik Kambatla < >> > kasha@cloudera.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Is there value in releasing current branch-2.8? Aren't we better off >> > re-cutting the branch off of branch-2? >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Akira Ajisaka < >> > ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > It's almost a year since branch-2.8 has cut. >> > > I'm thinking we need to release 2.8.0 ASAP. >> > > >> > > According to the following list, there are 5 blocker and 6 critical >> > issues. >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12334985 >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Akira >> > > >> > > >> > > On 10/18/16 10:47, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi Vinod, >> > >> >> > >> Any plan on first RC for branch-2.8 ? I think, it has been long time. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula >> > >> >> > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [mailto:vinodkv@apache.org] >> > >> Sent: 20 August 2016 00:56 >> > >> To: Jonathan Eagles >> > >> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> > >> Subject: Re: Updated 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT artifact >> > >> >> > >> Jon, >> > >> >> > >> That is around the time when I branched 2.8, so I guess you were >> getting >> > >> SNAPSHOT artifacts till then from the branch-2 nightly builds. >> > >> >> > >> If you need it, we can set up SNAPSHOT builds. Or just wait for the >> > first >> > >> RC, which is around the corner. >> > >> >> > >> +Vinod >> > >> >> > >> On Jul 28, 2016, at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Eagles >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> Latest snapshot is uploaded in Nov 2015, but checkins are still >> coming >> > >>> in quite frequently. >> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots >> /org/apach >> > >>> e/hadoop/hadoop-yarn-api/ >> > >>> >> > >>> Are there any plans to start producing updated SNAPSHOT artifacts >> for >> > >>> current hadoop development lines? >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> --------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> --------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > --001a1142d204286a490540edb692--