Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E0B200BC7 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:50:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 01554160B10; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EFD2160B01 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:50:28 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 7631 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2016 23:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7585 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2016 23:50:27 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:50:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1898FC6DB9; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:50:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.93 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.93 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-nGFn_ReiJv; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 432DC5F2F2; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id u205so79601013itc.0; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:50:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tZXNSmUWDG53pCoKmYWD3KZUfumhnkwxIMiwLoL1cCk=; b=wKzDFQ/hagDxKLY7ZK6Oa28q78uWupc6WCVoKTbupgXpxHRjc65dA3S0pX9T9lkzfQ Z9/lfmI2sMUyTC1dlJUrqsmgpZduTtHWiKmzSk9nr8X5+Ad9UC19/Swk3o5lidsLMPII OyXsZcI+okwW7AUTj4FtoEvEVY8E9CWdhsGFyZRFzbU8inczjb1y3spCX+qlVj/Q6CL2 52GxDX+wQZgrdDsrl0iOQpWVQ9hjfgVq8OuNxvEtLvb8/OxA7ZGwTIw35yE2spshZfFD mBklY2eeHQ5U2NiZbrTtaNA/7GW5Jps0r35r2rV32cCOhIv6YBHtGIek1gXdAMyVkVR2 BIuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tZXNSmUWDG53pCoKmYWD3KZUfumhnkwxIMiwLoL1cCk=; b=Y3anLvoqo+VLVI8TbqvWsQ7ffWXtj4RDhnBrP2PFW4xeblAb2HeFOkaTDqaEmN/XbH 7TW8RMEk85pwTabkZn9MmPBKcSUVwRQ0SOO9wmVdxGUTlMs8HVnIjHtES9DoshsuGqTo gIXG3V5n8fzXQBJKy8w9wib1ayp8WWXWizBcKmldn87mn9MBQhxTpGI01FvC2QbDDS8y 5Ed/e0ojOJrBkdSJOTcU4Zz2Dx/f7MpcoIkuORlGohDaqVLDjB+PuOJxyEqe0HroWsB6 dPXLlIcYAkyLfAO9soCUpvqcmMr5roblPry5kWdcIgQkSx+JlnmkePRc94E8l5h62Uun 8YOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveqlzanbFWU2JsRqDi1+Y6VQW5iEuJC3CqgkrALeGPJGW96gSf41hNCuRWXuDxzsmbvN1iJinpu+H1TLw== X-Received: by 10.107.131.150 with SMTP id n22mr8835379ioi.71.1478821819807; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:50:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.209.225 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:49:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8AD4EE147886274A8B495D6AF407DF698F17AC45@blreml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <2097738183.493992.1478299136472@mail.yahoo.com> From: Sangjin Lee Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:49:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Updated 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT artifact To: Karthik Kambatla Cc: Ming Ma , Jason Lowe , Akira Ajisaka , Brahma Reddy Battula , Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed15c417f1f0540fb0928 archived-at: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:50:30 -0000 --001a113ed15c417f1f0540fb0928 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > If there is interest in releasing off of branch-2.8, we should definitely > do that. As Sangjin mentioned, there might be value in doing 2.9 off > branch-2 too. > > How do we go about maintenance releases along those minor lines, and when > would we discontinue 2.6.x/2.7.x releases? > Per proposal on the release cadence and EOL discussed in another thread, once 2.8 is released probably the 2.6.x line would be EOLed. And that doesn't sound unreasonable. > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Ming Ma wrote: > >> I would also prefer releasing current 2.8 branch sooner. There are >> several incomplete features in branch-2 such as YARN-914 and HDFS-7877 that >> are better served if we can complete them in the next major release. >> Letting them span across multiple releases might not be desirable as there >> could be some potential compatibility issues involved. Therefore if we >> recut 2.8 it means we have to work on those items before the new 2.8 is >> released which could cause major delay on the schedule. >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: >> >>> +1. Resetting the 2.8 effort and the branch at this point may be >>> counter-productive. IMO we should focus on resolving the remaining >>> blockers >>> and getting it out the door. I also think that we should seriously >>> consider >>> 2.9 as well, as a fairly large number of changes have accumulated in >>> branch-2 (over branch-2.8). >>> >>> >>> Sangjin >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jason Lowe >>> wrote: >>> >>> > At this point my preference would be to do the most expeditious thing >>> to >>> > release 2.8, whether that's sticking with the branch-2.8 we have today >>> or >>> > re-cutting it on branch-2. Doing a quick JIRA query, there's been >>> almost >>> > 2,400 JIRAs resolved in 2.8.0 (1). For many of them, it's well-past >>> time >>> > they saw a release vehicle. If re-cutting the branch means we have to >>> wrap >>> > up a few extra things that are still in-progress on branch-2 or add a >>> few >>> > more blockers to the list before we release then I'd rather stay where >>> > we're at and ship it ASAP. >>> > >>> > Jason >>> > (1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in% >>> > 20%28hadoop%2C%20yarn%2C%20mapreduce%2C%20hdfs%29% >>> > 20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.8.0 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 5:31 PM, Karthik Kambatla < >>> > kasha@cloudera.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > Is there value in releasing current branch-2.8? Aren't we better off >>> > re-cutting the branch off of branch-2? >>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Akira Ajisaka < >>> > ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > It's almost a year since branch-2.8 has cut. >>> > > I'm thinking we need to release 2.8.0 ASAP. >>> > > >>> > > According to the following list, there are 5 blocker and 6 critical >>> > issues. >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12334985 >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > Akira >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 10/18/16 10:47, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Hi Vinod, >>> > >> >>> > >> Any plan on first RC for branch-2.8 ? I think, it has been long >>> time. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> --Brahma Reddy Battula >>> > >> >>> > >> -----Original Message----- >>> > >> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [mailto:vinodkv@apache.org] >>> > >> Sent: 20 August 2016 00:56 >>> > >> To: Jonathan Eagles >>> > >> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> > >> Subject: Re: Updated 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT artifact >>> > >> >>> > >> Jon, >>> > >> >>> > >> That is around the time when I branched 2.8, so I guess you were >>> getting >>> > >> SNAPSHOT artifacts till then from the branch-2 nightly builds. >>> > >> >>> > >> If you need it, we can set up SNAPSHOT builds. Or just wait for the >>> > first >>> > >> RC, which is around the corner. >>> > >> >>> > >> +Vinod >>> > >> >>> > >> On Jul 28, 2016, at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Eagles >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Latest snapshot is uploaded in Nov 2015, but checkins are still >>> coming >>> > >>> in quite frequently. >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots >>> /org/apach >>> > >>> e/hadoop/hadoop-yarn-api/ >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Are there any plans to start producing updated SNAPSHOT artifacts >>> for >>> > >>> current hadoop development lines? >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------- >>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------- >>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------- >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-help@hadoop.apac >>> he.org >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> > --001a113ed15c417f1f0540fb0928--