Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAN0Gg1cSK+5f+QucLoCNfeUdWb=dGB7XMJVfmB=himSUfGRdBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN0Gg1cu4kKmgQfkiCOxYANgWmaZBwQM0ySj+HLO7b_O-+VsYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGHyZ6+0BisOk7_mkq=n1sd4TM_Vns-sKTpMQ_FrXwvtsYoiag@mail.gmail.com> <CAN0Gg1cSK+5f+QucLoCNfeUdWb=dGB7XMJVfmB=himSUfGRdBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:52:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGHyZ6K-HLxvFSFLw1VpA0vat1G4d2_zwC-dEhMOPp58LVCG5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Jenkins Node Labelling Documentation
To: gmcdonald@apache.org
Cc: builds <builds@apache.org>,
	"infrastructure@apache.org Infrastructure" <infrastructure@apache.org>, Hadoop Common <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 21:52:51 -0000

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Gav <gmcdonald@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Why? yahoo-not-h2 is really not required since H2 is the same as all the
>> > other H* nodes.
>>
>> The yahoo-not-h2 label exists because the H2 node was misconfigured
>> for a long time and would fail builds as a result.
>
>
> Yes I know, but now its not, so is no longer needed.
>
>>
>> What label will
>> jobs taht are currently configured to avoid H2 be migrated to? Will
>> they be migrated automatically?
>
>
> Currently I'm asking that projects make the move themselves. Most jobs would
> be fine as they have
> multiple labels, so just need to drop the yahoo-not-h2 label to give them
> access to H2. If, when I drop the label I
> see jobs with it in use, I'll remove it.
>

I don't see a label I can move to that covers the same machines as the
current yahoo-not-h2 nodes and H2. It looks like a union of "hadoop"
and "docker" would do it, but "docker" is going away. Also I have to
have a single label for use in multi-configuration builds or jenkins
will treat the two labels as an axis for test selection rather than as
just a restriction for where the jobs can run. I could try to go back
to using an expression, but IIRC that gave us things like *s in the
path used for tests, which was not great.

Can we maybe expand the Hadoop label? (or would "beefy" cover the set?)

If the H* nodes are all the same, why do we need the labels HDFS,
MapReduce, Pig, Falcon, Tez, and ZooKeeper in addition to the Hadoop
label?


-- 
busbey

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org