hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zhe Zhang <zhe.zhang.resea...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA
Date Tue, 17 May 2016 23:42:16 GMT
Naming convention looks good. Thanks Andrew for driving this!

Could you explain a little more on the criteria of cutting alpha1 / alpha2?
What are the goals we want to achieve for alpha1? From EC's perspective,
maybe we should target on having all compatibility-related changes in
alpha1, like new config keys and fsimage format?

Thanks,

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I think it's working, though it takes some time for the rename to propagate
> in JIRA. JIRA is also currently being hammered by spammers, which might be
> related.
>
> Anyway, the new "3.0.0-alpha1" version should be live for all four
> subprojects, so have at it!
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Gangumalla, Uma <
> uma.gangumalla@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Andrew for driving. Sounds good. Go ahead please.
> >
> > Good luck :-)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Uma
> >
> > On 5/12/16, 10:52 AM, "Andrew Wang" <andrew.wang@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >Sounds like we have general agreement on this release numbering scheme
> for
> > >3.x.
> > >
> > >I'm going to attempt some mvn and JIRA invocations to get the version
> > >numbers lined up for alpha1, wish me luck.
> > >
> > >Best,
> > >Andrew
> > >
> > >On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Karthik Kambatla <kasha@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > The naming scheme sounds good. Since we want to start out sooner,
I
> am
> > >> > assuming we are not limiting ourselves to two alphas as the email
> > >>might
> > >> > indicate.
> > >> >
> > >> > Also, as the release manager, can you elaborate on your definitions
> of
> > >> > alpha and beta? Specifically, when do we expect downstream projects
> to
> > >> try
> > >> > and integrate and when we expect Hadoop users to try out the bits?
> > >>
> > >> Not to speak of all the downstream PMC,s but Bigtop project will jump
> > >> on the first alpha the same way we jumped on the first alpha back
> > >> in the 1 -> 2 transition period.
> > >>
> > >> Given that Bigtop currently integrates quite a bit of Hadoop ecosystem
> > >> that work is going to produce valuable feedback that we plan to
> > >>communicate
> > >> to the individual PMCs. What PMCs do with that feedback, of course,
> will
> > >> be up to them (obviously Bigtop can't take the ownership of issues
> that
> > >> go outside of integration work between projects in the Hadoop
> ecoystem).
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Roman.
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org
> >
> >
>
-- 
Zhe Zhang
Apache Hadoop Committer
http://zhe-thoughts.github.io/about/ | @oldcap

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message